top of page

# Fitness Group

Public·14 members
Fidel Subin

# Intervals I

Real intervals play an important role in the theory of integration, because they are the simplest sets whose "length" (or "measure" or "size") is easy to define. The concept of measure can then be extended to more complicated sets of real numbers, leading to the Borel measure and eventually to the Lebesgue measure.

## Intervals I

A half-open interval includes only one of its endpoints, and is denoted by mixing the notations for open and closed intervals.[2] For example, (0, 1] means greater than 0 and less than or equal to 1, while [0, 1) means greater than or equal to 0 and less than 1.

An interval is said to be left-bounded or right-bounded, if there is some real number that is, respectively, smaller than or larger than all its elements. An interval is said to be bounded, if it is both left- and right-bounded; and is said to be unbounded otherwise. Intervals that are bounded at only one end are said to be half-bounded. The empty set is bounded, and the set of all reals is the only interval that is unbounded at both ends. Bounded intervals are also commonly known as finite intervals.

An interval is said to be left-closed if it has a minimum element or is left-unbounded, right-closed if it has a maximum or is right unbounded; it is simply closed if it is both left-closed and right closed. So, the closed intervals coincide with the closed sets in that topology.

The terms segment and interval have been employed in the literature in two essentially opposite ways, resulting in ambiguity when these terms are used. The Encyclopedia of Mathematics[3] defines interval (without a qualifier) to exclude both endpoints (i.e., open interval) and segment to include both endpoints (i.e., closed interval), while Rudin's Principles of Mathematical Analysis[4] calls sets of the form [a, b] intervals and sets of the form (a, b) segments throughout. These terms tend to appear in older works; modern texts increasingly favor the term interval (qualified by open, closed, or half-open), regardless of whether endpoints are included.

The intervals are precisely the connected subsets of R \displaystyle \mathbb R . It follows that the image of an interval by any continuous function is also an interval. This is one formulation of the intermediate value theorem.

Dyadic intervals are relevant to several areas of numerical analysis, including adaptive mesh refinement, multigrid methods and wavelet analysis. Another way to represent such a structure is p-adic analysis (for p = 2).[6]

For n = 2 \displaystyle n=2 , this can be thought of as region bounded by a square or rectangle, whose sides are parallel to the coordinate axes, depending on whether the width of the intervals are the same or not; likewise, for n = 3 \displaystyle n=3 , this can be thought of as a region bounded by an axis-aligned cube or a rectangular cuboid.In higher dimensions, the Cartesian product of n \displaystyle n intervals is bounded by an n-dimensional hypercube or hyperrectangle.

After more than a year of consistent and structured base training (mountain running, skitouring, never on flats), I decided to incorporate 1x per week interval training (AeT and AnT are within 10%) with 4mins intervals. I began with them on the athletic track, and my objective and subjective observations are:1)I can hardly elevate my HR above my AeT2)When I do, perceived exertion is really high, but I barely get above AnT3)I almost always have a pain in my belly (on the side, classic)4)I find it extremely boring, which is in combination with the perceived exertion and all the pain not very good for motivation to another interval session.

So my question is, is there any significant training benefit for me to do flat intervals over hills? I found some articles on PubMed, which shows improvement of performance in both, sometimes better improvement with flat intervals (which make sense, if the testing track is 800m flat running). I never run on flat, so for me, uphill performance in mountains is what really counts.

Scott is correct about the uphill vs flat. I always encourage athletes to do their higher intensity work on a sport specific way. For you this means up hill. If your sport was road racing then flat intervals would make sense. For all mountain athletes it should be up hill. Hiking with a heavy pack for mountaineers and running or ski simulation bounding and striding for skimo racers. Take a look at this: -striding-and-bounding-technique/

The distance between any two musical notes is called an interval. You need to understand the concept of intervals and the notes that make up each interval so that you can identify and select the right notes to build harmonies. But you also use intervals to identify and build notes in a melody. As you play or sing the notes of a melody, the melody can do one of three things: It can stay on the same note, it can go up, or it can go down. When it goes up or down, the question of how much leads to the subject of melodic intervals.

Like scales, intervals come in different varieties: major, minor, perfect, diminished, and augmented. Knowing these classifications helps you identify and build harmonies for the music you play. For example, if you want to build a minor chord to harmonize with a melody, you must use a minor interval.

I do not understand what you mean by "the prior for 95% credible intervals". I do think you can determine the 95% credible interval from the values returned by your two functions. Take a look at the plot below You might also confirm your understanding of the "q" functions by inspecting the values returned by the qnorm() function since you may be more familiar with the standard normal distribution

So I'm starting this plan of walk/run intervals and some of the workouts start with a walking interval so I was trying to set my Ionic's interval workout to have the rest interval first. I couldn't do it and somehow deleted one of the intervals. I checked the post that said I could get it back from the PC dashboard, but now both intervals are called "rest". Also, the PC dashboard settings seem to sync to my watch, but not the app. I have no idea how to rename the intervals.

Is is possible to change the settings in the app to show the distances in my intervals vs. calories? I used the interval setting instead of the walk setting this morning to create custom intervals (instead of using C25k with my phone and tracking the total with my Ionic.)

I can see interval distance on the Ionic during the work out, but what I really need is to be able to see those stats after my workout so I can track my pace in my run intervals vs. my walk intervals.

The function is used to place intervals of fixed sizes at random (possiblyoverlapping) positions across one or more sequences. The input should be aGRanges objects giving the sequence intervals in which the random intervalssholud be placed. If they are to be placed anywhere within a referencesequence, use the scanFaIndex function from Rsamtools, to obtain a setof intervals.

For case 1, I came up with a greedy approach where I greedily pick the best length interval and update all other intervals to remove the overlap from the interval I just picked which has the complexity of \$O(n*k)\$, please let me know if I am on the right path.

Then, I have a model, which confidence intervals displayed are not wide enough: "The method yields confidence intervals for effects and predicted values that are falsely narrow; see Altman and Andersen (1989).".

There aren't any special intervals you should focus on. All of them are equally important. What you can do is to find songs you know, with melodies you can sing, and see what kind of intervals they use.

This way you'll remember what the intervals sound like. Now, no one can really suggest these kind of songs to you. They have to be songs you know and remember the melody, otherwise they won't help you.

Singing is not only very useful when internalizing intervals, but for developing your musicality in general. Interval recognition exercises that include singing are a basic part of most improvisation programs, where being able to sing a specific interval or a given string of intervals is very useful, to give one example.

Twenty minutes a day, every day, should be the minimum practice time and frequency if you are looking for serious progress. You don't have to practice intervals only, you can practice scale and chord recognition too.

Find two intervals that are easy to recognize for you, and start with those. I started with perfect 4th and perfect 5th, then added the tritone, and kept adding intervals every time I felt like I could handle one more.

If you can't recognize intervals that are close together yet, try with other pair of intervals that are farther apart. In your case, try major 2nd and perfect fourth instead. The difference should be more evident. Once you can distinguish that pair, try adding other interval to the mix.

To these excellent suggestions I would add -- every time you practice, don't just rely on the computer app and don't just rely on your singing voice and your ear. Also go to an instrument and play those intervals while you study. Pick any note at random and find the specific interval above and below. Train not only your voice and your ear, but also your fingers to find those intervals. Piano or other keyboard is very useful in this regard because you can clearly see the layout of the keys and count the white and black keys up or down to the interval, which reinforces what you are hearing.

Melody and harmony are highly intertwined. As such, I've found that practicing intervals as a function of harmony to be the most practical and useful way to work on ear training both personally and with students. 041b061a72